Editor’s Note: Cameron Scott of HealthlineNews wrote on the Is“da Vinci” Robotic Surgery A Revolution Or A Rip-Off? In this 2 Part Series we
check evidence alongside Mr Scott in the US and beyond.
da Vinci robot at Southmead Hospital, UK
|
By Cameron Scott
A robotic surgeon with tiny lights, tiny cameras, and steady
hands sounds like a miracle of technology. But what do the results show?
Even
before laparoscopic surgery took off around 1990, several companies, backed by
U.S. defense grants, were at work on robotic surgical systems.
Laparoscopic
surgery has proven to be a significant medical advance, turning major surgeries
that kept patients in the hospital for several days and left big scars behind
into fairly minor procedures. As robotic surgical systems moved through
research and testing, many doctors hoped the new technology would double down
on those advances.
The
companies building surgical robots were certainly optimistic. In product names
like Zeus, Aesop, and da Vinci, one can hear great humanitarian aspirations.
Zeus and
Aesop were slain by da Vinci, whose Silicon Valley manufacturer, Intuitive
Surgical, bought the company that made them and scrapped the projects. But many
of those hopes still hang on da Vinci, which was first approved for clinical
use by the Food and Drug Administration in 2000.
The da
Vinci surgical system continues to be the shiny new toy that hospitals and
private surgical practices boast about on billboards and websites. The system
doesn’t resemble a robot so much as a video game: The surgeon sits comfortably
behind a screen and looks at a magnified view of the surgical site while
operating the machine’s robotic arms.
The
robotic arms can ostensibly get into hard-to-reach places, promising patients
less bleeding, faster recovery, less chance of damage to important nerves, and
smaller scars than traditional surgeries.
Da
Vinci’s price tag partly explains why buyers might want to brag: A single robot
costs about US$2 million. Some of the attachments
that go on the arms are disposable, and their sole manufacturer is Intuitive.
Robotic surgery generally costs as much as US$3,500 more than a comparable
laparoscopic operation.
So is this the brave new
world of medicine or an expensive boondoggle?
NHS,
UK: New 'da Vinci' Robot Allows Patients To Leave Hospital Just Two Days After
Major Surgery
- New robot is being used by NHS experts in the fight against lung cancer
- Cyborg removes tumours with less impact on patient than keyhole surgery
- Da Vinci robot allows patients to leave hospital within 2 days of operations
By Anthea Gerrie for The Mail On Sunday
A four-armed ‘cyborg surgeon’ first developed to treat prostate
disease is now being used by NHS experts in the fight against lung cancer.
The innovation has allowed patients to leave hospital within two
days of surgery, suffering only minimal post-operative pain.
Cardiothoracic consultant Sasha Stamenkovic says the da Vinci
robot now used by his NHS trust for the majority of lung cancer operations
removes tumours with less impact on the patient than other forms of keyhole
surgery.
The da Vinci is activated by a doctor who operates a camera and a
surgeon who
manipulates the robot’s arms from a console using a joystick and
foot pedals. The hydraulic limbs move as she or he does, effectively creating a
‘cyborg’ melding of human and machine.
Named after the Renaissance artist
and inventor (pictured) who foresaw the
coming of robots, the da Vinci gives surgeons
a high-definition view of a patient’s organs in 3D
|
The machine locates and removes tumours without pressing on
patients’ ribs as it reaches and grabs the tumour. This pressing is the major
cause of operative pain in traditional laparoscopic, or keyhole, lung surgery.
‘This is a huge advance in lung-cancer treatment with a clear
advantage for patients,’ says Mr Stamenkovic, whose team has performed 30 lung
operations using the robot in the past year and will present its findings to
the world congress of cardiothoracic surgeons in September.
He says the Newcastle Hospital Trust, which has two of the
machines, bought for about £1.2million each two years ago, is also using them
to operate on prostate, gynaecological, liver, ENT and colorectal cancer
patients.
Named after the Renaissance artist and inventor who foresaw the
coming of robots, the da Vinci gives surgeons a high-definition view of a
patient’s organs in 3D via a screen inside the control console.
During the past two years, it has become a favoured option in the
UK for removing prostate tumours, which are difficult to excise using
traditional keyhole surgery.
In all, NHS trusts have invested more than £60million in 52 of the
surgical robots, whose articulated joints can turn corners inside patient’s bodies,
giving them a huge advantage over traditional devices.
But while many are also being used for gynaecological surgery, the
robot has potential uses that most trusts have not yet investigated, according
to Erica Schaefer of Intuitive Surgical, da Vinci’s California manufacturer,
which has sold 3,317 of the robots worldwide to date.
Use in Britain is spreading, however, as more surgeons learn how
to operate the robot. It has proven hugely popular with patients in the US,
where two-thirds of all da Vincis are located.
One surgeon who trained in robotic surgery with the Newcastle team
is now operating on lung-cancer patients in Middlesbrough, and a pilot
programme is being started in London in September by the Guy’s and St Thomas’
Trust.
Consultant thoracic surgeon Tom Routledge, head of robotic lung
surgery there, said: ‘Traditional keyhole surgery is like operating with
chopsticks, whereas the robot’s arms have elbows and wrists, with all the
articulation that implies.
‘We were encouraged enough to convince our managers to allow us
access to the robots, which have up to now only been used for prostate and
kidney-cancer surgery in our Trust and will be a more expensive way for us to
operate on lung patients.’ Patients who are medically eligible will be asked if
they would prefer robotic or traditional keyhole surgery, and Mr Routledge
said: ‘Whether we do manage to demonstrate benefits to patients with this
system remains an open question.’
da Vinci gives surgeons a high-definition view of a patient’s organs in 3D via a screen inside the control console |
Sylvia Barnes, 78, one of the first patients in Britain to have a
lung tumour removed by the da Vinci, admits she fell for the novelty of having
a robot do the surgery.
Her lung cancer was diagnosed last year by a scan after she
complained to her GP of feeling ‘very low’ and iron pills failed to work. ‘They
told me a tumour an inch wide had been found which they wanted to take out with
part of my lung.
‘At my age, I didn’t want to face such a big operation.’
However, when presented with the prospect of the da Vinci, she was
persuaded to think again.
‘It was the fact there would be just four dots on my back where
the pincers would go in, and a three-inch scar under my arm to pull out what
they were taking instead of a cut from front to back. The idea of the robot
appealed to my weird sense of humour,’ Mrs Barnes says.
Six days after having the operation at Newcastle’s Freeman Hospital
in April, she went home ‘with a hop, skip and a jump’ and within three weeks
was once again walking her grandson to school.
The robotic surgery treatment will not be available to all lung-
cancer patients as only tumours seven centimetres in diameter or less can be
extracted by the machine’s arms through the space between the ribs, explains Mr
Stamenkovic. He says there could be difficulties operating with the robot on
obese patients with a body mass index over 35.
However, the majority of patients with lung tumours would be
eligible, and Mr Stamenkovic says the Newcastle team expects to perform at
least 50 more robotic lung operations in the coming year.
The Trust is now offering training to surgeons from other parts of the
country.Original articles published in HealthlineNews and Mail On Sunday
Wow, thats surely awesome to know the reality and I am positive you will also love my article written here granny smith apple nutrition approximately Hope so that you will love to provide me a go-to.
ReplyDelete